NBC Olympics web strategy: a loser?

I’m a big fan of Hulu. I think it represents a huge landmark in forward thinking by the major television networks, and that they should be applauded for their work with that particular platform thus far. The video quality is more than reasonable (better than I get off my standard definition Comcast pipe, even!), on-demand, and almost impossibly ad-free. I can scrub through video and replay any particularly hilarious bits I choose, without needing to buy an expensive TiVo, or spend the time to set up Media Center or MythTV.

Actually, after several hours of trying I still can’t get MythTV to work, so maybe it’s just me.

But no one gets it perfect right off the bat. Hulu had its issues at first –– Hulu has its issues now. Slowly, one by one, they addressed them. You can pause during commercials now, and turn the volume down a bit since they’re always compressed beyond belief. But while the library continues to grow, NBC and Fox have made the incomprehensible decision to limit the number of available episodes online, even before DVD sets are available for shows. It’s the web, why limit content and revenue?

So, when I heard about NBC’s Olympics initiative, I was fairly excited. A multitude of streaming video selection, hours of playback and clips, and other on-demand content was the plan, and with how well they pulled Hulu off, I was looking forward to seeing it in action. Of course, I was in Amsterdam the whole time, so I never got to actually see it, instead relying on what other people and blogs said about it.

TechCrunch reported a couple of days ago that the NBC Olympics web initiative was an abysmal failure. A “loser”.

Of course, this was largely stated from a fiscal perspective, but it was stated nonetheless. While I didn’t get to see NBC Olympics in action, I did get to see the Dutch equivalent –– incidentally also in Silverlight only. It featured 10 streaming channels, one of which mirrored Nederlands 1, and the rest of which were simply raw feeds from various sporting events. There was a schedule for each channel, and all sports got very good representation in the lineup. I could pick whatever I wanted to watch, tune in to the relevant channel, and even channel surf between events when things got slow between heats.

When I went to a friend’s house in Den Haag, we decided to tune into the Olympics then as well, on a real television set! And I felt frustratingly limited. We got to watch one of three channels –– that means we got to watch one of three events. And all without the blissful lack of commentary that could be found on the streaming channels (incidentally, one of TechCrunch’s few technological complaints leveled at NBCOlympics was the lack of commentary; I happen to think this was a feature).

So the Dutch equivalent was marvelous. And it was only a live solution, too –– there were hardly any event clips put up after the fact. And from what I’ve seen after getting back, NBC’s version was at least as good, if not orders of magnitude better.

So how was the project an loser?

Even by TechCrunch’s own books, the whole thing was still in the black. NBC tested out an entirely new way to broadcast, one that represents how everything should be done in the future, and users got unprecedented choice in what they watched. Yes, there were mistakes and misjudgments in planning and execution, but nothing is done perfectly the first time, and Hulu well shows.

I would never call such a forward thinking attempt to innovate a loser.

8 Responses to “NBC Olympics web strategy: a loser?”

  1. 1 5dimes promo code

    This website was… how do you say it? Relevant!! Finally I’ve found something which helped me.
    Thanks a lot!

  2. 2 bet365 bonus code no deposit

    Hi! I understand this is sort of off-topic but I needed to ask.
    Does managing a well-established blog such as yours require a massive amount
    work? I’m completely new to operating a blog but
    I do write in my journal on a daily basis. I’d like to start a
    blog so I will be able to share my experience and views online.

    Please let me know if you have any suggestions or tips for new aspiring bloggers.
    Appreciate it!

  3. 3 youtube.com

    Thanks for a marvelous posting! I really enjoyed reading it, you will be a
    great author.I will remember to bookmark your blog and may come back in the future.
    I want to encourage that you continue your great writing, have
    a nice morning!

  4. 4 Poker Deposit Code

    I’m not sure exactly why but this blog is loading incredibly slow for me.
    Is anyone else having this problem or is it a issue on my end?
    I’ll check back later on and see if the problem still exists.

  5. 5 http://www.microstakespoker.com/

    I am no longer certain the place you are getting your information, but good topic.
    I must spend a while learning more or working out more.
    Thank you for fantastic info I used to be on the lookout
    for this info for my mission.

  6. 6 sport betting strategies

    I am sure this article has touched all the internet
    visitors, its really really nice piece of writing on building up new weblog.

  7. 7 อุดร

    If you wish for to take a great deal from this paragraph then
    you have to apply such strategies to your won weblog.

  8. 8 http://Goldiratimes.com/

    It’s a shame you don’t have a donate button! I’d without a doubt donate to thuis outstanding blog!
    I suppose for now i’ll settle for bookmarking and adding yyour RSS feed to my Google account.

    I loo forward to new updates and will ttalk about this blog with myy
    Facebook group. Chat soon!

Leave a Reply