Armed forces leaders from the U.S. and other major countries of the world are urging NATO to maintain a preemptive nuclear strike as a major option to keep other nations from obtaining nuclear weapons.
That’s real mature. Annihilate other civilizations with the very weapons they are trying to obtain? I don’t exactly think that’s the proper way to go about things. Mutually assured destruction is what’s supposed to keep the world in check as far as nuclear weapons goes, not preemptive unilateral destruction.
Besides, doesn’t anyone remember the last time we did something rash, bold, and maybe a little preemptive regarding weapons proliferation?